9 5,802 25.9 0 1,897 24.9 1,897 24.9
0 85–89 5,775 25.8 5,775 25.8 0 1,685 22.1 1,685 22.1 0 90+ 4,515 20.1 4,515 20.1 0 982 12.9 982 12.9 0 Fiscal year 04/05 5,786 25.8 5,786 25.8 Selleck NVP-BSK805 0 1,856 24.4 1,856 24.4 0 05/06 5,481 24.4 5,481 24.4 0 1,871 24.6 1,871 24.6 0 06/07 5,539 24.7 5,539 24.7 0 1,919 25.2 1,919 25.2 0 07/08 5,612 25.0 5,612 25.0 0 1,965 25.8 1,965 25.8 0 RIOa Mean ± STD, 0 (most urban) to 100 (most rural) 16.7 ± 18.9 16.1 ± 18.7 0.03 17.3 ± 19.6 17.1 ± 20.1 0.01 LTCa 4,797 21.4 4,797 21.4 0 1,352 17.8 1,352 17.8 0 Income quintilea 1 (low) 5,218 23.3 5,315 23.7 0.01 1,739 22.8 1,649 21.7 0.03 2 4,536 20.2 4,563 20.4 0 1,569 20.6 1,625 21.4 0.02 3 4,361 19.5 4,377 19.5 0 1,419 18.6 1,417 19.3 0.02 4 4,216 18.8 4,119 18.4 0.01 1,421 18.7 1,396 18.3 0.01 5 (high)
4,087 18.2 4,044 18.0 0 1,463 18.0 1,470 19.3 0 Number of CADGsb 0–3 8,079 36 8,032 35.8 0 2,502 32.9 2,360 31 0.04 4–7 13,567 60.5 13,670 61 0.01 4,816 63.3 4,987 65.5 0.05 8–12 772 3.4 716 3.2 0.01 293 3.8 264 3.5 0.02 Osteoporosis diagnosisb 2,050 9.1 1,785 8.0 0.04 271 3.6 180 2.4 0.07 DXA testb 2,346 10.5 2,707 12.1 0.05 337 4.4 296 3.9 0.03 Osteoporosis treatmentb 7,145 31.9 6,178 27.6 0.1c 753 9.9 448 5.9 0.15c Prior fractureb Humerus/radius/ulna 948 4.2 464 2.1 0.12c 183 2.4 58 0.8 0.13c Vertebral 329 1.5 110 0.5 0.1c 87 1.1 36 0.5 0.07 Otherd 2,863 12.8 493 2.2 0.41c 903 11.9 134 1.8 0.41c CADG collapsed ambulatory diagnostic group, DXA dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, IQR interquartile range, LTC long-term care, RIO rurality index for Ontario, SD standardized difference, STD standard deviation aBased on postal code and census data https://www.selleckchem.com/products/fg-4592.html at time of index bMedical and pharmacy claims identified within 365 days prior to index cSD >0.1 indicates unbalance between ZD1839 mouse cohorts [23] dOther = femur, pelvis, lumbar spine, ribs, shoulder and upper arm, shoulder girdle, pathological or stress fracture Outcomes and resource utilization With the exception of same day surgery,
more individuals in the fracture cohort than the non-hip fracture cohort utilized health-care resources (Table 2). Of patients residing in the check details community at the time of hip fracture, 19 % (men) to 24 % (women) entered a LTC facility within a year of hip fracture.