Authors’ contributions TW synthesized, characterized, and interpr

Authors’ contributions TW synthesized, characterized, and interpreted the data of the SWNTs, as well as drafted the initial version of the manuscript. ESS had the original idea of the project, contributed to the experimental

setup, interpreted the data, and drafted the final manuscript with TW. TY contributed with the experimental setup and transport measurements of the SWNTs. YT coordinated the project and supervised TW. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.”
“Background selleck inhibitor Nanotechnology is a promising field for generating new types of nanomaterials with biomedical applications [1]. Silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) have attracted significant interest among the emerging nanoproducts because of their unique properties and increasing use for various applications in nanomedicine. Silver, in the form of silver nitrate or silver sulfadiazine, has been long used for the treatment of bacterial infections associated with burns and wounds because of its antibacterial properties [2]. Numerous physical, chemical, and biological methods have been developed for the synthesis of AgNPs. However, the synthesis of nanoparticles using PI3K inhibitor conventional physical and chemical methods has check details a low yield, and it is difficult to prepare AgNPs with

a well-defined size [3]. Furthermore, chemical methods make use of toxic-reducing agents, such as citrate, borohydride, or other organic compounds, and can negatively impact the environment. Because the control of particle size and shape is an important factor for various biomedical 3-mercaptopyruvate sulfurtransferase applications, the use of biological methods to synthesize AgNPs is an environmentally

friendly alternative. These methods involve synthesizing AgNPs using bacterial proteins that can exert control over the shape, size, and monodispersity of the nanoparticles by varying parameters such as the type of microorganism, growth stage, growth medium, synthesis conditions, pH, substrate concentrations, temperature, and reaction time [4]. The conventional methods like physical and chemical such as laser ablation, pyrolysis, lithography, chemical vapour deposition, sol-gel techniques, and electro-deposition for synthesis of nanoparticles seem to be very expensive and hazardous. Further, the procedure involves various reactants, in particularly reducing agents (eg., sodium borohydride or potassium bitartrate or methoxypolyethylene glycol or hydrazine) and also it requires a stabilizing agent such as sodium dodecyl benzyl sulfate or polyvinyl pyrrolidone to prevent the agglomeration of metallic nanoparticles. Although many methods are available for the synthesis of nanoparticles, there is an increasing need to develop simple, cost effective, high-yield, and environmentally friendly procedures. Therefore, it is essential to look for alternative green methods for the synthesis of metal nanoparticles [4, 5].

Comments are closed.