Conclusion. Integration was a heterogeneously defined concept. Our systematic review highlighted 38 clinical, educational, research, and administrative indicators. With further refinement, these indicators may facilitate assessment of the level of integration

of oncology and PC.”
“Savalle M, Gillaizeau F, Maruani G, Puymirat E, Bellenfant F, Houillier P, Fagon J, Faisy C. Assessment of body cell mass at bedside in critically ill patients. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 303: E389-E396, 2012. First published May 29, 2012; doi:10.1152/ajpendo.00502.2011.-Critical illness affects body composition profoundly, especially body cell mass (BCM). BCM loss reflects lean tissue wasting and could be a nutritional marker in critically ill patients. However, BCM assessment with usual isotopic or tracer methods is impractical in intensive care units (ICUs). We aimed to modelize the BCM of critically Barasertib ill patients using variables available at bedside. Fat-free mass (FFM), bone mineral (Mo), and extracellular water (ECW) of 49 critically ill patients were measured prospectively by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry learn more and multifrequency bioimpedance. BCM was estimated according to the four-compartment cellular level: BCM = FFM – (ECW/0.98) – (0.73 x Mo). Variables that might influence the BCM were assessed, and multivariable analysis using fractional polynomials was conducted to determine the relations

between BCM and these data. Bootstrap resampling was then used to estimate the most stable model predicting Z-DEVD-FMK chemical structure BCM. BCM was 22.7 +/- 5.4 kg. The most frequent model included height (cm), leg circumference (cm), weight shift (Delta) between ICU admission and body composition assessment (kg), and trunk length (cm) as a linear function: BCM (kg) = 0.266 X height + 0.287 X leg circumference + 0.305 X Delta weight – 0.406 x trunk length – 13.52. The fraction of variance explained by this model (adjusted r(2)) was 46%. Including bioelectrical impedance analysis variables in the model did not improve BCM prediction.

In summary, our results suggest that BCM can be estimated at bedside, with an error lower than +/- 20% in 90% subjects, on the basis of static (height, trunk length), less stable (leg circumference), and dynamic biometric variables (Delta weight) for critically ill patients.”
“Herein, we report the intrinsic conformational preferences of alpha-D-Manp-(1 -> 6)-alpha,beta-D-Manp, (1) in the free state and as two (ASAI and ConA) lectin-bound forms. NMR spectroscopy and molecular dynamics techniques are used as 3D-structural determination tools. In free form disaccharide I displays a fair amount of conformational freedom, with one major (phi/psi 95 +/- 30 degrees/195 +/- 201) and one minor (95 +/- 30 degrees/70 +/- 20 degrees) conformations around the glycosidic linkage and around the omega angle, both the gg and gg rotamers are almost equally populated.