Participants were identified using a campus-wide survey about com

Participants were identified using a campus-wide survey about commuting habits which had been performed every winter since 2007 (Morabia and Zheng, 2009). Over the years, 4213 respondents agreed to be contacted for research projects related to transportation. They comprised 43% of car commuters and 51% of PT commuters; 6% only commuted by bike, motorcycle, or walked. We recruited and financially remunerated for time a see more sample of those who were nonsmokers, had no work-related exposure to air pollutants, were students or employees

of Queens College, City University of New York, and commuted 5 days/week to and from the campus either by car or by PT. Subjects were not eligible if they had recently used anti-inflammatory drugs, such as aspirin, NSAID, or corticoid drugs. The car and PT commuters were sent several recruitment emails and were entered into the study in the order in which they volunteered between September 2009 and December 2010. The initial objective was to recruit 100 car (“cases”) and 100 PT commuters (“controls”). WBC, CRP, LINE-1 and IL-6 DNA methylation, diet (including alcohol

intake), overall energy expenditure, and body weight were measured on all participants. PD-0332991 price Body weight and height were measured using a Detecto® medical scale and gauge. The protocol had been approved by the Institutional Review Board of Queens College. Blood was obtained by venipuncture at Queens College by a nurse into coded EDTA-tubes. WBC count (cells/mm3) and hs-CRP (mg/dl) were assayed by a commercial clinical laboratory (Quest). WBC counts were

determined immediately after collection, while, for the other measures, a 7 ml tube was taken in a refrigerated box to Columbia University, plasma and WBC isolated Unoprostone and stored at − 80 °C. Samples were analyzed in batches at the middle and end of the study. Each batch had a mix of PT and car commuter bloods. DNA was extracted from the WBC using FlexiGene DNA Kits (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) at Columbia University. Bisulfite modification was conducted using an EZ DNA Methylation-Gold kit (Zymo Research, Irvine, CA) following the manufacturer’s recommendations. The biotinylated PCR products were purified and pyrosequencing was run on a PyroMark Q24 (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). We used non-CpG cytosine residues as internal controls to verify efficient sodium bisulfite DNA conversion, and universal unmethylated (whole genome amplified) and methylated DNA (CpGenome Universal Methylated DNA, Millipore, Billerica, MA) were run as controls. Methylation quantification was performed using the PyroMark Q24 1.010 software. The degree of methylation was expressed for each DNA locus as percentage methylated cytosine over the sum of methylated and unmethylated cytosine. For LINE-1, values across the 3 CpG sites were averaged while for IL-6, values for the 6 sites were averaged.

Comments are closed.