While reviewing benefits and drawbacks of these two

models, we will focus on potential (dis)advantages of a third human-derived cancer model: primary tumor organoids. The first ever-growing human cancer cell line was established from the cervical carcinoma of Henrietta Lacks in 1951 [6]. Since then, scores of cancer cell lines have been generated which have proven invaluable for cancer research and drug development. For example, the discovery that human breast cancer cell lines MCF-7 and ZR75-1 grow estrogen www.selleckchem.com/screening/mapk-library.html dependently [7] was pivotal to the development of the estrogen receptor antagonist fulvestrant (Faslodex, AstraZeneca) [8]. Drug screens across large panels of cancer cell lines yielded additional findings, such as the identification of drug targets and gene signatures that predict drug responses [9 and 10]. There are several practical advantages of working with cell lines: they are homogenous, easy to propagate, grow almost infinitely in simple media, and allow extensive experimentation including high-throughput drug screens. Disadvantages such as genotypic drift and cross-contamination can usually be prevented by rigorous quality control and freezing well-characterized, EPZ5676 mouse low passage stocks [11]. More difficult to overcome is the poor efficiency with which permanent cell lines can be established from solid tumors: for primary breast cancers the success rate is between

1 and 10% [12] while prostate cancer is represented by less than 10 cell lines [13••]. This inefficiency is mainly due to a challenging in vitro adaptation of primary tumor cells which usually lose growth potential after few passages and go into crisis. Clonal cells

only rarely emerge from the dying culture. As a result, the available cancer cell lines fall short of faithfully representing the clinical cancer spectrum. Since many cancer cell lines have been generated from metastatic and fast growing tumors, primary and slowly growing Inositol monophosphatase 1 tumors are severely underrepresented. Control cell lines from normal tissue of the same patient are also scarce. Current cancer cell lines can therefore not adequately serve as models for tumor progression [ 11] ( Figure 1). Additional problems arise from the loss of tumor heterogeneity and adaptation to in vitro growth. Consequently, gene expression profiles of tumors are regularly closer to corresponding normal tissues rather than cancer cell lines [ 14]. To reestablish a physiological environment and counteract genotypic divergence, cell lines have been transplanted into mouse models. Although these xenografts offer improvements over traditional cell culture, more success has been achieved by avoiding in vitro culture altogether and directly engrafting human cancers [ 15] ( Table 1). PDTX are obtained by directly implanting freshly resected tumor pieces subcutaneously or orthotopically into immuno-compromised mice [16 and 17].