The new FCSEMS is short but has a wide flare to prevent migration. This appears to be effective, because we observed asymptomatic migration in only 1 case. In this case, the stent migrated outward. We assumed that the stent migrated out because of shrinkage of the cyst. Recently, an FCSEMS with a novel shape and delivery system specially designed for enterocystostomy was described.11 and 12 The authors reported that enterocystostomy using this lumen-apposing stent was accomplished with high technical and clinical success in this pilot observational study. Compared with a lumen-apposing stent, the new FCSEMS has some marked advantages,

the main ones being its wide lumen diameter and the thin and simple delivery system. The diameter of this stent is 16 mm, and the delivery system is 10F. In all cases, the stent was inserted without changing to an endoscope with a larger channel Compound Library diameter. When DEN was performed, the diameter of the stent was large enough to insert a normal or a therapeutic endoscope. The new FCSEMS was inserted and expanded successfully in all cases. Stent replacement was not necessary

in any patient. Although the stent was large in diameter, minimal pre-dilation of the tract was needed, which appeared to reduce the risk of leakage. In the pancreatic pseudocyst cases, stent insertion was effective for drainage. In BIBW2992 price the WOPN cases, DEN was performed successfully through the endoscope. Because DEN cannot be performed through a plastic stent, the FCSEMS is superior in this regard. Multiple sessions of DEN were required to achieve complete Ergoloid removal of necrosis, but the initial stent placement avoided the need for tract dilation before each endoscopic procedure. The FCSEMS appears to be useful for both drainage and DEN. However, in the WOPN cases without appropriate debridement, the result was unfavorable. The clinical success rate indicates that, even when a large-diameter tract was maintained, solid necrosis could not be completely drained spontaneously. There was one serious complication where

bleeding occurred. Angiography revealed that the point of bleeding was distinct from the stent, and we believe that the vessel damage was not related to the stent but was the result of inflammation or necrosectomy. Because this was a pilot study, the complication rate was not fully analyzed and needs to be evaluated more thoroughly in a larger study. One limitation of this study is that it was a retrospective evaluation of a small number of cases. Second, the FCSEMS was inserted via the transgastric route in every case. Stent insertion via the transduodenal route could be associated with different complications, such as migration or leakage. Third, the follow-up duration was short, so recurrence and other complications might have been underestimated. Further studies are needed to evaluate these aspects.