, 2002). However, altered fixation behavior has also been observed using entirely non-social materials (Joseph et al., 2009), suggesting a more general difference in visuo-motor processing in ASD. In the few published examples of eye-traces in ASD participants, fixations are often only slightly away from targeted

regions of interest (Pelphrey et al., 2002; Rice et al., 2012). Higher variability of saccadic amplitude has also been observed within (Takarae et al., 2004) and between autistic participants http://www.selleckchem.com/products/AZD8055.html (Goldberg et al., 2002; Takarae et al., 2004; Stanley-Cary et al., 2011). Collectively, these studies suggest that the precision of eye movements is less reliable in ASD. Much of the early visual cortical hierarchy is organized into a series of precise retinotopically mapped regions. A key aspect of these maps is that they display the so-called cortical magnification factor, which describes the fact that the region of visual space that we foveate on has considerably more cortex devoted to its processing than have more peripheral regions (Daniel & Whitteridge, 1961; Tootell et al., 1982). This non-uniformity of cortical representation is very dramatic indeed, such that in the squirrel

monkey, a 1° stimulus presented at fixation would activate approximately 42 mm2 of primary visual cortex (V1), whereas the same stimulus presented GSK126 purchase at 6° eccentricity would activate only about 1.5 mm2 (Adams & Horton, 2003), a near 30-fold difference in representation. The implications for macroscopic recordings of visual activity at the scalp surface are clear. Presentation of a stimulus at fixation will result in activation of a very large patch of early visual cortex relative to when it is presented at more peripheral Meloxicam locations, which is clearly borne out as a sharp amplitude decrease in the visual evoked potential (VEP)

under such circumstances (Schlykowa et al., 1993; Jedynak & Skrandies, 1998). Early visuo-spatial maps are developmentally driven, as is abundantly evident in patients with amblyopia, where functional imaging has shown that V1 receptive fields are shifted to represent more parafoveal locations for the strabismic eye (Conner et al., 2007). Even in neurotypical adults, rapid changes in the mapping of perceptual space can be induced by experimentally altering the relationship between eye movements and visual stimulation (Awater et al., 2005). It seems a reasonable proposition then that the titration of cortical space representation in early visual regions develops during infancy and early childhood and that this development is strongly influenced by the fidelity of the eye-gaze system.