PVD patients had a significantly higher risk of ACM (HR 1.36, P < 0.0001) and CM (HR = 1.43, P < 0.0001). These results were consistent across the regions, but in Japan both patients with and without PVD had a better survival than their counterparts in Europe and the United States. The effect of diagnosis of PVD on survival in haemodialysis patients is shown in Figure 2 by region. Although this graph shows DOPPS II results only, DOPPS I results were similar. A diagnosis of PVD also had a significant impact on all-cause
hospitalization (HR = 1.19, P < 0.0001) and hospitalization for a major cardiovascular event (HR = 2.05, P < 0.0001). As the investigators point out, the results are even more worrying when it is considered that the increased risk in mortality
and morbidity in patients with PVD was also seen in patients without prior Palbociclib CVD AZD6244 and despite a higher use of statins and aspirin in this group (21.8% vs 12.9%, P < 0.001, and 33.5% vs 20.0%, P < 0.0001), respectively. Although this study has limitations which the authors acknowledge, it highlights that a subgroup of patients may benefit from aggressive therapeutic intervention. The incidence of PVD is not well known in patients with diabetes mellitus but it is presumed that diabetic patients have an increased risk of PVD. In a recent Japanese study, 613 incident haemodialysis patients were divided into two groups: patients with diabetes mellitus (n = 342) and without diabetes (n = 271).32 These Thiamet G patients were screened with ankle-brachial pressure index (ABI) measurements annually. If the ABI was abnormal or they had ischaemic symptoms, ultrasonographic and/or angiographic examinations of the lower limbs were performed. During the follow-up period (51 ± 33 months), 20.0% of patients
had PVD and 3.0% underwent amputation. Eight-year event-free survival for PVD and amputation was significantly lower in diabetic patients than for those without diabetes (67.0% vs 90.0%, P < 0.0001; 92.0% vs 98.0%, P = 0.018, respectively). On Cox multivariate analysis, diabetes was a strong predictor for PVD (HR 7.04, 95% CI: 2.99–16.67, P < 0.0001) and for amputation (HR 8.54, 95% CI: 1.03–71.42, P = 0.046). However, there were no differences seen in the 8-year event-free survival for amputation (84.0% vs 88.0%, P = 0.24) and in death (46.0% vs 61.0%, P = 0.75) for patients with PVD who underwent revascularization, suggesting that interventions at an earlier stage of PVD may improve clinical outcomes even in patients with diabetic ESKD. Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative: No recommendation. UK Renal Association: No recommendation. Canadian Society of Nephrology: No recommendation. European Best Practice Guidelines: No recommendation. International Guidelines: No recommendation.