For Si nanotubes with solid continuous sidewalls (as with the 70-nm-thick SiNTs studied here), the nanotubes must be physically

removed from their underlying growth substrate, effectively ‘uncapping’ the SiNT array and allowing facile infiltration of Fe3O4 nanoparticles under the assistance of a simple GPCR & G Protein inhibitor Nd magnet. In either case, dense conformal loading of the Fe3O4 into a given nanotube interior can be accomplished (Figure 2). Figure 2 TEM images of SiNTs. (A) SiNTs with 10-nm wall thickness – empty; (B) SiNTs with 10-nm wall thickness filled with 4-nm Fe3O4 NPs; (C) SiNTs with 70-nm wall thickness – empty; and (D) SiNTs with 70-nm wall thickness filled with 4-nm Fe3O4 NPs. The purpose of fabricating such a magnetic nanocomposite is its applicability in biomedicine as a magnetic-guided drug delivery vehicle. A key requirement of such a system is a low blocking temperature (T B) which is defined Epigenetics Compound Library solubility dmso by the transition

between superparamagnetic (SPM) behavior and the blocked state of the nanocomposite. T B has to be far below room temperature, which entails a missing magnetic remanence. So above T B, the system offers no magnetic remanence if the external field is switched off. From temperature-dependent magnetization measurements, the transition temperature between SPM behavior and blocked state has been extracted. The so-called blocking temperature T B depends strongly on the particle size of the infiltrated iron oxide NPs and on the distance between the particles within the tubes. To obtain T B of the nanotubes with different infiltrated NPs, zero field cooled/field cooled (ZFC/FC) magnetization measurements have been performed. For this purpose, the sample is first cooled down from room temperature to T = 4 K without an external magnetic field. Then, a low magnetic field of H = 500 Oe is applied and the magnetization measured up to T = 300 K and subsequently down

to T = 4 K. In these initial studies, we report Thymidylate synthase the different blocking temperatures for Fe3O4 nanoparticles of either 4 or 10 nm infiltrated into SiNTs containing 10- or 70-nm thick walls (Table 1). Remarkably low T B values of 12 K are found for the 4-nm Fe3O4 nanoparticles loaded into both the 10-nm as well as 70-nm thick SiNTs, indicating that the iron oxide particles do not interact magnetically. For the larger 10-nm-diameter Fe3O4 nanoparticles loaded into either the 10- or 70-nm thick SiNTs, two to three different discrete blocking temperatures are observed for a given nanotube sample (all well below room temperature) (Figure 3), consistent with a broader distribution of nanoparticle sizes in the iron oxide (as observed in the TEM image of these nanoparticles in Figure 1D).