Nadler et al.8 reported that female athletes who suffered from low back pain or sustained a lower extremity injury demonstrated a significant disparity in side-to-side maximum hip extension strength. Similarly, over an athletic season, Leetun et al.3 observed individuals, among intercollegiate basketball and track athletes, with hip abduction and external Vemurafenib rotation weakness were more likely to sustain a lower extremity injury. Although athletic injuries have been associated with impairments in core stability, assessing core stability remains difficult. Although there is no consensus
on the definition and measurement of core stability, several tests and measurements are available that claim to measure and assess components of core stability. Suggested core stability components include strength, endurance, flexibility, motor control, and function. Leetun et al.3 assessed the core strength and endurance of 140 collegiate
EGFR inhibitors list basketball and track athletes with the objective of identifying individuals at risk for injuries. They recorded maximum isometric hip abductor and external rotation strength and the muscular endurance capabilities of the anterior, posterior, and lateral trunk muscles. They observed that individuals with stronger core musculature were less likely to sustain a lower extremity injury. Gabbe et al.9 measured the range of motion of the trunk and hip joints. Parkhurst and Burnett10 assessed motor control of the core when
they attempted to identify the relationship between lower back proprioception and injury. Along with two other tests, they used a trunk reposition only test to measure low back proprioception. Assuming core stability contributes to different functions and activities, another option in assessing core stability indirectly is to observe an individual performing a relevant functional movement or activity. Kibler et al.7 suggested evaluating the performance of a one leg squat or single leg balance activity for deviations. Deviations or difficulty performing the activity suggests possible core stability impairment. We might be able to define, and/or understand, the concept of core stability if we have better understanding of the parameters that contribute to core stability, or related to core stability indirectly. Despite the number of available core stability related measurements, the reliability of these tests can vary. Bohannon11 observed very high intra-rater reliability for isometric trunk strength during a single session reliability study. Unlike Bohannon,11 Moreland et al.12 found very low inter-rater reliability when measuring trunk isometric forces. Testing core muscular endurance of athletes, Evans et al.13 observed high to very high intra-tester reliability. Similarly, Gabbe et al.9 found high to very high test-retest reliability of four parameters related to core flexibility measurements.