1 and qTGW1.2 was verified. Major effects were also detected for GY and NGP in population III, with the enhancing alleles from MY46. This is not unexpected since the same direction of allelic effects had been found in the BC2F5 population. Moreover, no significant effects were detected for HD and NP, in accordance with the previous results. It was concluded that qTGW1.2 had multiple effects on NGP, TGW and GY, but little effect on NP and HD. In addition, a significant effect was detected for NGP in population I, with the enhancing allele from ZS97. This suggests that qTGW1.1 also influences other yield traits. Genetic dissection of
QTL regions into different QTL has been frequently reported [3], [25], [26], [27] and [28]. In most of the studies, the QTL was chosen for fine-mapping because the original QTL effect estimated from primary mapping populations was see more considerably large. In validation studies using populations segregating for the target region in an isogenic background, the QTL regions contained two or more QTL linked in coupling [3], [25] and [26]. In rare circumstances, phenotypic effects were tested without previous QTL information when NILs with mapped recombination breakpoints became APO866 available, resulting in
the dissection of different QTL linked in repulsion phase in a random genomic region [27]. The present study provides a new example of QTL dissection; a QTL that showed no significant main effect, but a significant epistatic effect in a primary mapping population, was targeted and tested using a series of populations with sequential segregating regions. By this means, two rice QTL for grain weight
were separated. They were linked in repulsion on the long arm of chromosome 1, where qTGW1.1 was located between RM11437 and RM11615 with the ZS97 allele increasing grain weight, and qTGW1.2 was located between RM11615 and RM11800 with the ZS97 allele decreasing grain weight. The importance of epistasis for the genetic control of yield traits in rice has long been recognized [6] and [29]. However, the individual epistatic loci which showed no significant main effect remain to be tested. For these loci, genetic effects at one locus may differ in magnitude and change in direction depending on the genotype at other loci. Thus validation Cytidine deaminase of the QTL may be jeopardized because the effects may be undetected in a new genetic background. In the present study, a small number of NILs were examined at an early generation stage and verified in samples of larger size in higher generations. This approach could be considered practical for the validation of individual epistatic loci and QTL showing marginal main effects for complex traits in primary mapping populations. QTL analysis has been extensively conducted to investigate the genetic basis of heterosis in rice and maize, with considerable attention paid to the role of dominance and overdominance [28], [29], [30], [31] and [32].