, 2007). The FOUR aspects of PEST and the FIVE of PESTLE were independently suggested and expanded in Elliott (2002) and Elliott and Cutts (2004) to emphasise that successful and sustainable management requires a set of SIX actions (the 6-tenets) later expanded further as the SEVEN aspects called the 7-tenets (see Box 1) (e.g. see also Mee et al., 2008). By combining ideas on our needs for the marine systems, the consequences of those needs and the Venetoclax means of tackling any problems resulting from those needs and consequences, the FIVE elements of DPSIR framework give us a valuable philosophy for tackling and communicating

our methods of marine management (McLusky and Elliott, 2004 and Atkins et al., 2011). This cyclical framework considers the Driving forces (human activities and Selleck Wortmannin economic sectors responsible for the pressures); Pressures (particular stressors on the environment); State changes (in the characteristics and conditions of the natural environment); Impacts (changes in the human system and the way in which we use the marine area) and Responses (the creation of different policy options and economic instruments to overcome the state changes and impacts). To this we may also add Recovery (a reduction in the state changes as the result of these actions) this giving a SIXTH element

in the DPSIRR framework. We recently took the view that for this approach to be valid, it requires a set of FIFTEEN DPSIR-ES&SB (Ecosystem Services and Societal Benefits) postulates (see Atkins et al., 2011). Business management also takes the view that you cannot management anything unless you can measure it and that by setting quantitative objectives, you will know when your management has achieved something – the management of the environment is exactly the same and so we need indicators of health

which needs to have the FIVE SMART characteristics: Specific, Measurable, Achievable/Appropriate/Attainable, Resminostat Realistic/Results focussed/Relevant, Time-bounded/Timely otherwise they cannot be used in measuring, monitoring and managing change. We need this type of indicators for the P, S and I parts of the DPSIR approach and, increasingly, we need environmental indicators which have THREE basic functions ( Aubry and Elliott, 2006): To simplify: amongst the diverse components of an ecosystem, a few indicators are needed according to their perceived relevance for characterising the overall state of the ecosystem. To quantify: the indicator is compared with reference values considered to be characteristic of either ‘pristine’ or heavily impacted ecosystems to determine changes from reference or expected conditions (e.g. Hering et al., 2010). To communicate: with stakeholders and policy makers, by promoting information exchange and comparison of spatial and temporal patterns.