27). Very few temporary or permanent discontinuations of abacavir/nevirapine occurred before clinical events: two (both in N) before death, two (both in N) before new or recurrent WHO 4 or death, and four (two in A and two in N) before new or recurrent WHO 3 or 4 or death. Knowledge of CD4 cell count in participants where this was routinely available was not a reason for substitution, and no NORA participants were deemed to have failed first-line therapy in the first 48 weeks. We observed a highly significant virological and immunological benefit for nevirapine compared with abacavir (both administered

with coformulated lamivudine/zidovudine) selleck products over 48 weeks in symptomatic ART-naïve adult Ugandans initiating ART with CD4 counts <200 cells/μL. However, abacavir had less toxicity and, surprisingly, differences between randomized groups in these markers of disease progression were not matched by similar differences in clinical outcomes. In fact, at 48 weeks significantly more participants in the nevirapine group than in the abacavir group had died or developed new or mTOR inhibitor recurrent WHO stage 3 or 4 events. These findings raise the possibility of a disconnect

between clinical outcome and virological/immunological responses. Similar results were seen in the ART Cohort Collaboration meta-analysis of 12 prospective cohort studies [10], which found a nonsignificant trend towards lower risks of AIDS or death with abacavir and higher risks with nevirapine compared with Aprepitant efavirenz, without superior virological responses for abacavir. However, more recent analyses from this group [11] with backbone NRTIs restricted to zidovudine/lamivudine

found no difference between those on abacavir and those on nevirapine in progression to AIDS or death within 2 years of ART initiation. If a disconnect between HIV RNA or CD4 cell count and clinical response does exist, it may be more readily apparent in Africa, where clinical events are more common, not least because malnutrition and background pathogen load are higher, and ART is generally started at lower CD4 cell counts than in high-income countries. Further, in these settings a switch to second-line therapy is rarely based on virological failure and thus patients generally remain on ART until immunological or clinical failure. Taken together, these data may have major implications for the way CD4 cell count and HIV RNA are used as ‘surrogates’ for clinical outcome, particularly in resource-limited settings with highly restricted formularies [12]. According to formal statistical definitions [13], CD4 cell counts and HIV RNA viral load are strong prognostic markers, i.e. predict subsequent disease progression.