“
“Background & Aims: Assessment of the severity of liver fibrosis is critical for the evaluation and determination of prognosis in patients with chronic liver disease (CLD). Transient elastography (TE) received approval from the U.S. Food JAK inhibitor and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2013 and it is predicted that clinicians in the U.S will be using it increasingly. The aim of this study was to compare elastography measurments of liver fibrosis using the Supersonic Shear Imaging (SSI)

and TE in CLD. Methods: This was a prospective study of 195 patients (mean age 56.8; BMI 26.5) in which liver stiffness was assessed using TE (M probe or XL probe used when the M probe is unreliable for obtaining measurement in obese patients) and SSI during the same clinic visit. Our study included patients with the following underlying liver conditions: 121 chronic hepatitis C, 19 chronic hepatitis B, 17 NAFLD, 7 PBC 8 PSC, 9 HCV/HIV and 14 with other liver diseases. We acquired reliable measurements

using the median value obtained from 10 (TE) or 5 (SSI) valid liver stiffness measurements (LSM), respectively with a success rate of > 60% with an IQR of < 30%. Results: By TE, reliable LSM were obtained in 112 (57.4%) and 78 (40%) patients using the M and XL probe, respectively in 190 out of 195 patients (total reliability of TE was 97.4%). The mean BMI was 24.0 kg/m2 and 29.7kg/m2, respectively. On the other

hand, reliable LSM were obtained in 176 (90.3%) patients by SSI. Z-VAD-FMK research buy When reliable measurements were obtained, there was a very significant correlation between LSM obtained by TE and SSI (r = 0.91, p <0.0001). LSM obtained by TE and SSI were also significantly correlated with noninvasive scoring systems such as FIB4, AST/ ALT ratio, and AST to platelet ratio. When compared with histological findings from 95 patients who underwent liver biopsy, 上海皓元医药股份有限公司 the AUROC by TE and SSI for detecting fibrosis stage F > 3 was 0.877 (sensitivity 69%, specificity 94%) and 0.898 (sensitivity 92%, specificity 75%), respectively. Furthermore, AUROC for detecting cirrhosis (F=4) by TE and SSI were 0.9453 (sensitivity 90%, specificity 93%) and 0.9741 (sensitivity 100%, specificity 87%), respectively. Conclusions: When only the M probe was used, a significantly lower percentage of reliable LSM were made using TE as compared to SSI. When the XL probe is utilized, TE was more reliable than SSI in determining liver stiffness in obese patients. Therefore, similar or higher rates of reliable LSM were made with TE as compared to SSI when both the M and XL probes were used. Furthermore, SSI and TE were similarly accurate in diagnosing liver fibrosis in patients with chronic liver disease. Disclosures: Eugene R.