DXA scans at 0, 1, and 2 years were performed in respectively 73, 63, and 61 % of the patients. The prednisone and placebo strategy group in the current analyses did not differ significantly from the original study groups for any of the baseline variables. The two groups included in the current analyses only differed from each other at baseline in the number of patients with Fedratinib cell line rheumatoid factor and the mean DAS28.

Table 1 Characteristics of the patient groups in the CAMERA-II study and of the subgroups included in the BMD analyses   CAMERA-II study BMD analyses   MTX + prednisone, n = 117 MTX + placebo, n = 119 p-value MTX + prednisone, n = 85 MTX + placebo, n = 94 p-value Baseline characteristics Female gender (n (%)) 70 (60) 72 (61) 0.849 50 (59) 61 (65) 0.403 Age (years, mean ± SD) 54 ± 14 53 ± 13 0.493 55 ± 13 52 ± 13 selleckchem 0.177 RF positive (n (%)) 64 (55) 73 (61) 0.101 41 (58) 59 (75) 0.028 DAS28 (mean ± SD) 5.8 ± 1.3 RSL3 chemical structure 5.5 ± 1.1 0.045 5.7 ± 1.2 5.3 ± 1.1 0.025 Radiographic damage

present (n (%)) 34 (29) 24 (20) 0.127 26 (31) 19 (22) 0.149 Erosion score (SHS, median, IQR) 0 (0–0) 0 (0–0) 0.337 0 (0–0) 0 (0–0) 0.223 sBMD lumbar spine (g/cm2, mean±SD)       1.13 ± 0.17 1.11 ± 0.17 0.544 sBMD left hip (g/cm2, mean±SD)       0.94 ± 0.13 0.91 ± 0.16 0.252  Normal BMD (n (%))       52 (61) 55 (58) 0.180  Osteopenia (n (%))       30 (35) 29 (31)    Osteoporosis (n (%))       3 (4) 10 (11)   Study measurements             Mean DAS28 during trial (mean ± SD) 2.6 ± 1.0 3.2 ± 1.1 <0.001 2.7 ± 1.0 3.2 ± 1.1 0.001 Radiographic damage present at end (n (%)) 35 (30) 44 (41) 0.310 27 (35) 35 (41) 0.499 Erosion score at end

(SHS, median, IQR) 0 (0–0) 0 (0–2) 0.024 0 (0–0) 0 (0–2) 0.133 Hospitalization for symptomatic vertebral fracture during trial (n (%)) 1 (1) 0 (0) 0.312 1 (1) 0 (0) 0.292 Peripheral fracture during trial (n (%)) 1 (1) 0 (0) 0.312 1 (1) 0 (0) 0.292 Data concerning the patient groups of the original CAMERA-II study have been published elsewhere [13] BMD bone mineral density, MTX methotrexate, RF rheumatoid factor, VAS visual analog scale, TJC tender joint count based on 36 joints, mafosfamide SJC swollen joint count based on 36 joints, ESR erythrocyte sedimentation rate, CRP c-reactive protein, DAS28 disease activity score based on 28 joints, n number, SD standard deviation, IQR interquartile range, SHS Sharp-Van der Heijde score, sBMD standardized bone mineral density BMD measurements The mean sBMD levels for each treatment group at specific time points are shown in Fig. 2. The sBMD increased significantly over the first year of treatment in both treatment groups in the lumbar spine (paired samples t-test with sBMD at 0 and 1 year, p < 0.001 for the prednisone group and the placebo group), with a mean increase in sBMD of 2.7 % in the prednisone group and 2.4 % in the placebo group.