In terms of targeting signaling pathways in TISCs, ON123300, an a

In terms of targeting signaling pathways in TISCs, ON123300, an alkaline triphosphate (ATP) mimetic kinase inhibitor,72, 73 inhibits tumor cell proliferation and induces

apoptosis, primarily through inhibition of CDK4 and AMPK-related protein kinase 5, without causing broader hepatotoxicity. This ATP kinase inhibitor may provide alternative TISC targeting. Novel chemoprevention strategies aimed at targeting TISC through inhibition of the MAPK pathway and/or vitamin D supplementation have been proposed.74-76 Key insights include the marked vitamin D deficiency observed in cirrhotic patients who develop HCC. In the setting of cirrhosis, vitamin D supplementation may act as a chemoprevention strategy by restoring TGF-β signaling, because vitamin D

up-regulates β2-spectrin in cirrhotic patients. CH5424802 datasheet Within alcoholic liver disease, a sensitization of liver macrophages to portal endotoxin, which activates TLR4 on macrophages, results in the production of inflammatory cytokines and activation of p38 MAPK, both contributing to the activation of the nuclear factor kappa light-chain enhancer of activated B cell signaling cascade.42, 77 Liver cirrhosis beta-catenin inhibitor results from increased sensitivity of hepatic stellate cells to TGF-β, leading to increased proliferation and production of extracellular matrix via activation of p38 MAPK signaling. New work reinforces that the TGF-β and β-catenin pathways are central to the process of TISC transformation and maintenance. Transcriptome profiling confirms poor prognosis of TISC-based HCC. At the conference, several issues were identified as areas of focus for future work. One unresolved issue is whether liver TISCs have reduced rates of proliferation, compared to the bulk tumor population. A quiescent state is proposed for TISCs, but strong evidence 上海皓元医药股份有限公司 is lacking. A second outstanding issue is the origin of TISCs. Although the hierarchic cancer model proposes that TISCs are derived from stem cells, they may also originate from hepatocyte dedifferentiation through loss of β2-Spectrin or up-regulation of β-catenin and resultant up-regulation of Oct-4 and Nanog. A third issue is the need for agreement

on the phenotype of TISCs. For example, in the field of hematopoietic malignancy, CD34+CD38− is a standard immune phenotype for TISCs, whereas CD44high/+CD24low/− is used to identify TISCs in breast cancer. As reviewed above, surface markers, such as EpCAM, CD133, CD49f, CD44, and others, have all been proposed for identifying TISCs, as have functional traits, such as efflux of Hoechst 33342, associated with the side population. A final unanswered question is the effect of TISC-targeted therapy on the LPC population of the regenerating liver. As LPCs and TISCs share many common pathways for proliferation and maintenance of stemness, targeting TGF-β or β-catenin may reduce the effectiveness of LPCs to regenerate the liver during cirrhosis.

Comments are closed.