Increasingly government departments funding these institutions tend to focus on the number of people coming through the doors to see exhibitions, often so called “blockbuster shows”, rather than the critical research being undertaken behind the scenes documenting biodiversity and how this is being affected by climate change as well as the increasing urbanisation and coastal development in Australia. Governments fail to recognise that much of this research only occurs in museums and without it we cannot answer questions; such as how distribution patterns are changing associated with

climate change and loss of habitats, critical in the development and management of marine parks, for example. Loss of this taxonomic expertise will lead to a loss of students as they can see 5-FU concentration no future in the discipline, and hence the loss of the next generation of taxonomists. People do not become taxonomists overnight, and it is critical that students are mentored by today’s practising taxonomists. As already mentioned, there is an amazing proliferation of coastal and offshore development, often associated with selleck the mining industry, here in Australia. For example along the Queensland coast there are proposals for eight port developments, in some cases new ports,

in others expansion of existing ports, to allow the export of minerals, primarily coal. All these developments include dredging and disposal of dredge Forskolin order spoils off shore and within the Great Barrier Reef World Heritage Area (Grech et al., 2013). Similar developments are occurring along the northwest Australian coast. Yet the composition of the benthic communities is poorly known in both these areas and increasingly it is difficult

to find the experts able to identify the fauna or obtain funds to support these experts. This often this leads to studies where the fauna is just identified to major groups which means that only limited information can be extracted from the data and which certainly cannot be compared with other areas or allow time series analyses. In some cases the material is deposited in the relevant state museum but, increasingly, they are limited in their ability to incorporate this material into collections and make it available for research. Australian institutions continue to fund expensive offshore sampling programmes but fail to allocate funds to actually identify the material collected (Kenchington and Hutchings, 2012, and references therein) and with it support the remaining taxonomists. Often these taxonomists, who have spent a lifetime studying their groups, can provide useful information on the ecology and habitat requirements of the fauna which can add value to the data being analysed. Increasingly they are using molecular data to complement the morphological data, which may reveal cryptic species as well as contributing to phylogenetic studies.