International guidelines (notably those from WHO) Ulixertinib are considered, along with an assessment of the vaccine’s risk-benefit ratio based on pharmaco-epidemiological and modeling studies. Consideration of the organization of health and disease prevention systems is also an important element of the process. In the case of an alert of adverse events following immunization

or of potential secondary effects, recommendations may include requests for strengthened vaccine safety surveillance. The primary vaccine-preventable outcomes that the CTV uses to generate recommendations are, in order of importance: overall morbidity, mortality, and hospitalizations, as well as epidemic potential. A referral from the DGS can include a request that outcomes be given extra consideration in the decision Palbociclib chemical structure making process. Usually, however, the CTV assembles all of the information available in order to reach a decision. Decision making by the CTV has not required that vaccine cost, overall program cost, affordability, and financial sustainability be considered. Even though the CTV has the authority to contract experts to conduct full economic analyses, it has not previously done so. However,

economic studies have been taken into account for recent decisions (e.g., vaccines against rotavirus and HPV), and in the future, it is anticipated

that most decision making processes will need to include an economic evaluation. Therefore, the CTV is having discussions with the HAS (Haute Autorité de Santé) on the content and format of these economic evaluations, and will put into place a working group to redefine the objectives and measures of the evaluations (at the moment, the Endonuclease INVS is in charge of economic evaluations and usually collaborates with a public health laboratory). Economic analyses were taken into consideration during the formulation of recommendations for vaccinations against rotavirus, HPV, and meningococcus C. To reach those recommendations, a cost-benefit analysis was carried out using high and low price estimates of the vaccines. For the meningococcus C vaccine, the current price recommended by industry was considered high, while the price at which the government had purchased vaccines for previous vaccination campaigns was low. For the rotavirus vaccine, the chosen price for analysis was the current price recommended by industry. This raised a major issue since after recommendation of the vaccine is made, the vaccine price is negotiated between government and industry. Therefore, the changing price of the vaccine means it probably should not be considered in the economic evaluation. This point is currently being discussed with the HAS.