Moreover, a multiple regression model showed that C2 was not significantly related to other variants as above. ROC curves were drawn to https://www.selleckchem.com/products/netarsudil-ar-13324.html detect the optimum cut-off level of the average C2 or C0 for CR (Fig. 5). Using all data of the cases treated for 48 weeks in groups 1 and 2 (N = 37), the area under ROC curves were 0.731 ± 0.089 (95 % CI 0.557–0.905, p = 0.022)

for C2 and 0.373 ± 0.109 (95 % CI 0.156–0.587, not significant) for C0. From these results, the optimum cut-off point for C2 was determined to be 615 ng/mL (sensitivity 75.0 %, specificity 76.9 %); however, C0 was inappropriate eFT-508 cost to predict remission. Using the data of group 2 alone (N = 19), similar results were obtained. Namely, the AUCs were BI 10773 cell line 0.802 ± 0.101 (95 % CI 0.604–1.000, p = 0.025) for C2 and 0.444 ± 0.158 (95 % CI 0.135–0.754, not significant) for C0, and the cut-off point for C2 was determined to be 598 ng/mL (sensitivity 66.7 %, specificity 100 %). When the data of C2 were limited to the cases <340 mg/dL of total cholesterol

(N = 25), the AUCs were greater (0.868 ± 0.072, 95 % CI 0.712–1.000, p = 0.003) and the cut-off point 598 ng/mL was more accurately provided (sensitivity 81.3 %, specificity 88.9 %). Fig. 5 Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves for serum CyA concentration. The optimal cut-off level of C2 for CR was determined to be 615 ng/mL (sensitivity 75.6 %, specificity 76.9 %) and 598 ng/mL (sensitivity 81.3 %, specificity 88.9 %) (arrows), using the ROC curve drawn from the average C2 of all cases and the cases <340 mg/dL of total cholesterol treated for 48 weeks in groups 1 and 2, respectively Relationship between blood CyA concentration and treatment responses Patients in groups 1 and 2 were further divided into subgroups A (C2 ≥600 ng/mL) and B (C2 <600 ng/mL) because the ROC showed that the optimal cut-off point of C2 was approximately 600 ng/mL. The number of patients in groups 1A, 1B, 2A, and 2B was Buspirone HCl 19, 4, 10, and 13, respectively (Fig. 6). Most of the patients in groups 1A and 2A achieved CR. Among these 4 groups, groups 1A and 2A showed

significantly higher cumulative CR ratios than group 2B for 48 weeks; group 1B was excluded because of the statistically insufficient number of patients (Fig. 7). Meanwhile, there was no significant difference between groups 1A and 2A. Groups 1A and 2A, consisting of all patients with C2 ≥ 600 ng/mL, also showed a significantly higher cumulative ratio of not only CR (p = 0.0028, Fig. 8a) but also CR + ICRI (p = 0.0069, Fig. 8b) than groups 1B and 2B (C2 <600 ng/mL). Fig. 6 Remission and withdrawal rates of groups 1A, 1B, 2A, and 2B at 48 weeks. Patients were divided into groups 1 and 2 according to administration frequency and then subdivided into subgroups A (C2 ≥600 ng/mL) and B (C2 <600 ng/mL). There was a significant difference in CR between groups A and B (p = 0.018, per-protocol analysis) Fig.