Note that we did not seek to mimic the mentholation process used by industry, nor to replicate the menthol content of a specific commercial cigarette. Rather, our goal was to produce cigarettes with a known amount of menthol at the upper end Rucaparib molecular weight of the range of the levels reported for commercial brands so as to maximize the likelihood for measuring potential differences in our human exposure studies. To accomplish these goals we developed a technique to generate cigarettes at predefined and reproducible levels of menthol. We also developed and qualified a method to co-extract

and measure both the menthol and nicotine content of the tobacco rod and cigarette filter, as it is important that the amount of menthol and nicotine in the custom-mentholated 5-FU order cigarettes be accurately characterized for our ongoing exposures studies. This paper describes our custom mentholation

procedure based on direct vapor deposition, the nicotine and menthol analysis method adopted, and the assessment of pertinent characteristics of our custom-mentholated cigarettes that serve to verify their similarity to their nonmentholated precursors. These characteristics included their menthol and nicotine content, the distribution of nicotine and menthol between the tobacco rod and filter, the transfer efficiency of both menthol and nicotine from the tobacco rod to mainstream smoke, and the rate of loss of menthol and nicotine from the stored cigarettes over time. To evaluate the menthol and nicotine content of the unburned cigarettes, we separated each cigarette into rod (tobacco and paper) and filter, weighed them to the nearest 0.1 mg, and extracted and analyzed the rod and filter separately using a technique adapted from previously published work [30]. Extraction was performed using a solution of 0.8 mL isopropanol (Fisher), 20 mL methyl tert-butyl

ether (MTBE; Sigma-Aldrich) containing a surrogate compound, quinoline (Sigma-Aldrich) at 100 μg/mL, and 2 mL of 2 N sodium hydroxide (Sigma-Aldrich). After agitation Cepharanthine on an orbital shaker for four hours at 160 rotations per minute (rpm), the resulting extract was stored at -20 °C until analysis. Analysis was performed on an Agilent 6890 gas chromatograph with flame ionization detection (GC/FID) using a 15 m x 0.53 mm, 1 μm film thickness DB-WAX capillary column (Agilent). Under constant flow conditions of 3 mL/min helium, a 1 μL splitless injection was performed. The oven temperature was programmed as follows: initial temperature of 65 °C for 2 min; 4 °C/min to 85 °C, 2 min hold; 20 °C/min to 235 °C, 2 min hold; 18.5 min total GC runtime. The GC/FID was calibrated for L-menthol (CAS # 216-51-5, Acros) and (-)-nicotine (CAS # 54-11-5, Sigma-Aldrich) using seven calibration standards prepared in extraction solvent and ranging in concentration from 5 to 1,000 μg/mL.