oneidensis MR-1. As noted earlier, several of the genes predicted to belong to the so2426 regulon also have Fur-binding motifs in their upstream regions. The likely molecular

#Nutlin-3 mouse randurls[1|1|,|CHEM1|]# mechanism controlling iron homeostasis in S. oneidensis MR-1 involves Fur-mediated transcriptional repression, which includes down-regulation of so2426 expression under iron-replete conditions and derepression followed by SO2426-mediated transcriptional activation under iron-limited conditions. This may explain the residual siderophore production in the Δso2426 mutant. It is also possible that an as-yet uncharacterized secondary mechanism for siderophore production exists in strain MR-1. Conclusions SO2426 is annotated as a DNA-binding response regulator, but its specific function in S. Seliciclib mw oneidensis MR-1 was previously undefined. Using combined in silico motif prediction and in vitro binding assays along with physiological characterization, this

report provides an important empirical step toward describing the SO2426 regulon. We initially identified a putative SO2426-binding consensus motif that consists of two conserved pentamers (5′-CAAAA-3′) in tandem. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays demonstrated that recombinant SO2426 exhibits binding specificity with its predicted motif within the 5′ regulatory region flanking a siderophore biosynthesis operon. A Δso2426 mutant was unable to synthesize CAS-reactive siderophores at wild-type rates under iron limitation. Collectively, these data support a function for SO2426 as a positive regulator of siderophore-mediated iron acquisition in S. oneidensis MR-1. In addition to exhibiting iron-responsive expression, the so2426 gene has been previously shown to be up-regulated in response to chromate stress [15, 41]. The up-regulation of iron acquisition and iron storage systems in response to metal stress is not unique to S. oneidensis. In Arthrobacter sp. FB24, a number of proteins with putative functions in iron sequestration,

such as Ferritin-Dps family proteins, as well as Reiske (2Fe-2S) domain proteins, showed increased abundance as a result of chromate stress [17]. Copper has been shown not to disrupt Fe-S clusters in important enzymes in E. coli [44]. An E. coli strain defective in iron transport was also found to be more sensitive to chromium [19]. Exposure to manganese in B. subtilis resulted in altered intracellular iron pools with subsequent expression of Fur-regulated genes [45]. The reason for the up-regulation of iron-responsive genes is unclear. It has been speculated that metal ions such as chromate result in oxidative stress mediated through Fenton-type reactions with ferrous iron [18, 46–48]. Up-regulation of iron storage proteins may help alleviate metal-induced oxidative damage by binding excess Fe and preventing its interaction with other metal ions.