The total terpene concentrations in the musts treated with GO were even lower than that of the controls, an explanation click here for this could be the absorption of volatile compounds on hydrophobic regions of the protein. In contrast to the experiments described in Section 3.1, only low enzyme concentrations were used in these vinification experiments, causing an expectedly low release of terpenes. Nevertheless, with increasing dose of GO the

total terpene concentrations increased as well, suggesting that GO was not completely inactive, although the detected changes were at a low level (see Table 5 and Fig. S3). Interestingly, both samples treated with GO/AO and AO displayed terpene concentrations equal to those of the controls. In tests with the Traminer extract, it was shown that AO could release only low levels of terpenes compared to the control without the presence of the glucosidase (21 ppm total compared to the controls). Considering the fact that it was

reported that grape glucosidases mainly hydrolyse primary terpenols ( Maicas & Mateo, 2005), and further regarding the differences in the release of primary/tertiary terpenols by different enzyme preparations as discussed in Section 3.2, it could be expected that different enzyme treatments would Cilengitide result in recognisably distinct terpene profiles in the musts. However, such an observation cannot be confirmed. The analysis of terpenes after the alcoholic fermentation (Table 5, see also Supplementary

Figs. S3 and S4) shows that the differences in terpene concentrations between the treatments are less distinct than before the alcoholic fermentation. Further, the total terpene concentrations in the wines were lower than in the musts. However, it is interesting to observe that the overall trends observed in the musts are still recognisable after alcoholic fermentation, which is evident when comparing the results in the Supplementary Figs. S3 and S4. This indicates that dependent on the glycosidase activity HSP90 profile of the yeast involved, enzyme treatment at an early stage of winemaking, as presented here, may indeed affect the sensory properties of the final product. The results of the sensory evaluation are shown in Fig. 2. “Riesling HBLA” was included as a further control for the sensory tests. This wine was produced from the same harvest of grapes without cold maceration but otherwise the same fermentation conditions. Interestingly, in the aroma intensity ranking (Fig. 2a), the highest intensity was recognised in the wines treated with AO only, while wines treated with GO/AO received the lowest rating (except “Riesling HBLA”). This is remarkable as treatment with AO and GO/AO did not result in analytically distinct terpene concentrations compared to the controls.