These simulation

results were used as the baseline scenario. The ability of the SWAT model to simulate streamflow was evaluated using four complementary measures of model performance: (1) percent bias, (2) R2, (3) Nash–Sutcliffe model efficiency coefficient (NS), and (4) root mean square error (RMSE). The equations describing these measures are provided in Appendix A. The baseline scenario was assumed to reflect current conditions. To evaluate the magnitude of responses from the hydrological systems of the Brahmaputra basin to various components of climate change, we designed six scenarios by altering one variable at a time. These scenarios are presented in Table 2. Each scenario was run for the same simulation period (1988–2004), except with this website modified climatic inputs, which provided a consistent basis for the scenario impacts as compared to baseline Talazoparib conditions. Although a 30-year period is preferred to present baseline conditions (Arnell, 1996 and Jha et al., 2006), we used a 15-year period (1988–2004) including three major flooding years (1988, 1998 and 2004) and two major drought years (1989 and 1994) for

the baseline because of the limitations in the station observed precipitation data. The sensitivity simulations were designed based on the approach described in Jha et al. (2006) and Wu et al. (2012b). The first two simulations in Table 2 focused on multiplying the baseline daily atmospheric CO2 concentration by factors of 1.5 and 2.0, which are within the range of atmospheric CO2 projections described in the Fourth Assessment Report (AR4) of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) for the region, but less than the projections Mirabegron described in the Fifth Assessment Report (Kirtman et al., 2013 and Solomon, 2007). The next two simulations reflected a daily increase in minimum and maximum air temperature by 2 °C and 4 °C incorporated in the baseline scenario. The CMIP5 multi-model mean projection of the annual average temperature change over south Asia was over 3 °C (Hijioka et al., 2014). The last two scenarios represented 10% and 20% increases

in the daily precipitation over the baseline scenario. The CMIP5 multi-model mean projected a precipitation increase up to 12% over south Asia by the end of the 21st century which was similar to the projections by the CMIP3 models (Kirtman et al., 2013 and Shashikanth et al., 2013). Next, we designed future climate and land use change impact assessment simulations with estimated CO2 concentration, temperature increase, and land use change scenarios for each 10-year period of the 21st century. The scenarios were executed with third-generation Canadian GCM version 3.1 (CGCM3.1) Statistical Downscaling Model (SDSM)-downscaled precipitation (Pervez and Henebry, 2014), projected temperature and CO2 concentration, and downscaled IMAGE-projected land use information for the A1B and A2 scenarios.