The difference between our results and previously published reports may also be due to the difference in the serovars LCZ696 mouse and strains used for the studies, and the coverage of the Erastin in vivo proteins due to different methodologies used for the studies [25–28, 33]. None of these previous studies has reported the differential
expression of SipA, SipC, and SopB in hydrogen peroxide-treated Salmonella, as described in our study. Our results complemented and further extended previous proteomic analysis of Salmonella, and furthermore, demonstrated the importance of examining the expression of Salmonella proteins, including SPI-1 proteins, in vitro using different quantitative proteomic analyses and in vivo in the context of infection. Each of the currently-available proteomic approaches, including LC-MS and MALDI-ToF procedures, can only detect a subset of Salmonella proteins and may exhibit limited overlap of protein coverage with other methods [25–28]. It is suggested that these complementary approaches should be carried out independently to generate a comprehensive coverage of bacterial proteomes. Further investigation with our quantitative proteomic approach, in combination with examination
and confirmation of the expression of these proteins in vivo, should provide significant insights into the role of these proteins in pathogenesis during Salmonella infection. Conclusion We have employed stable isotope labeling coupled with mass spectrometry to carry out a quantitative proteomic analysis of Salmonella YAP-TEAD Inhibitor 1 manufacturer enterica serovar Enteritidis. Seventy-six proteins whose expression is differentially modulated upon exposure to H2O2 have been identified. SPI-1 effector SipC was expressed approximately 3-fold higher and SopB was expressed approximately 2-fold lower in the presence Immune system of H2O2, while no significant change in the expression of another SPI-1 protein SipA was observed. The expression of these SPI-1 factors
was confirmed by Western blot analyses, validating the accuracy and reproducibility of our approach for quantitative analyses of protein expression. Furthermore, substantial expression of SipA and SipC but not SopB was found in the late phase of infection in macrophages and in the spleen of infected mice. This study provides the first direct evidence that SipC is highly expressed in the spleen at late stage of salmonellosis in vivo. Our results also suggest a possible role of the identified proteins, including SipC, in supporting the survival and replication of Salmonella under oxidative stress and during its systemic infection in vivo. Methods Reagents and preparation of protein samples for proteomic analysis All reagents were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich unless otherwise specified.