However, the threat of environmental change on marine-dependent livelihoods is common throughout the Caribbean. Indeed, Caribbean-wide changes in the marine environment show that issues of marine degradation are widespread throughout the region [43] and [52], and are expected to worsen with climate change [2] and [53]. Urgent attention is required to provide sustainable Cell Cycle inhibitor and resilient futures for the many
thousands of marine-dependent livelihoods throughout the Caribbean threatened because of already depleted marine resources and future environmental changes. Thank you to all of the individuals who gave up their time to participate in this study, and to the staff at Anguilla DFMR who provided invaluable local information and logistical support. Thanks also to Katie Newton who assisted with data collection. Johanna Forster was supported by a joint studentship from the Economic and Social Research Council and the Natural Environment Research Council (UK). “
“Small-scale fisheries have been recently recognised as significant sources of global world
catches of seafood and integral parts of coastal livelihoods and employment of millions find more of fishers worldwide [1], [2] and [3]. They are vital for food security [4] and [5] and/or poverty reduction in low-income countries [4] and [6]. Owing to the broad geographic spread and large numbers of fishers, these fisheries suffer from the global affliction of overfishing and under-management [5] and [7]. In cases of severe overfishing, management must now turn from profit maximisation to conservation Y-27632 of breeding populations and biodiversity [8]. Unfortunately, institutions that manage small-scale fisheries often suffer from weak technical capacity and limited human resources [1], [9] and [10]. Recent prescriptions for ailing small-scale fisheries involve a more holistic “ecosystem approach” to fisheries management (EAF). EAF can be defined as a blend of ecosystem
management to conserve the biophysical components of ecosystems and fisheries management to satisfy societal needs by focusing on fishing activities and the target resource [11]. Integral parts of an EAF are the involvement of stakeholders in the management process and consideration of a broad range of objectives [9], [11] and [12]. This differs somewhat from ecosystem-based fisheries management (EBFM), which strives to sustain healthy marine ecosystems and the fisheries they support [13]. In harmony with EAF principles [11], many scientists have argued for co-management systems in which governance is shared between government agencies and stakeholders [1], [14] and [15]. Co-management can be seen as a prospective way to implement an ecosystem-based approach but it does not necessarily result in EAF outcomes.